Thomas,
Before hanging Tom Valone from the nearest tree, note that there is
a large spectrum of possibilities in the words "working Searle (sic)
Machine". Semantics have always played a pivotal role in Free Energy
research. "Working" may mean anything from "It spins by itself, although
we have to give it a tiny kick each cycle" to "It re-charges its own
battery while powering this light, although we have no idea what the
battery chemistry is" to "When we spin it to 10 Krpm it lifts off,
although we haven't done it in a vacuum" etc etc. Try to get Tom (or
anyone) to define exactly what "Working" means and then you can gently
(?) remind him that he may be playing the "Validation by Implication"
game to the detriment of all.
Also question his source - is it his own eyes and instruments on
site, or is it a trusted friend telling him in minute detail, or is it a
gullible investor trying to bail out of an over-sold free energy scam,
or is it the inventor him/herself trying to convince you over the
internet, of all places, that the world has changed and you can be part
of it for a mere megabuck or two.
cheers - George [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thomas malloy wrote:
Vortexians:
I'd like to get your opinions on the Valone matter. If you got caught
cheating in a game of cards in the old west, you could expect to be
shot. Tom said that there is a working Searle Machine and other SPFE
machines in existence. AFAIK, this is not a truthful statement. He has
been given the opportunity to produce or repent, he has chosen to
ignore. IMHO, this reflects badly on every legitimate researcher in
the field. Why he did this is known only to him, but I assume that he
is trying to sell books or memberships. So the question is, should we
be self policing, or just let Tom do what he wants to do?
--- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! --
http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---
