----- Original Message -----
From: Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2009 7:37 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The PickensPlan website

> Only by evaporative cooling.  

> Ambient temperature doesn't change just
> because the air is moving.

What about funneling followed by expansion?

> I think a better solution will be vertical axis wind turbines such as
> this small one:
> 
> http://www.urbangreenenergy.com/turbine.php?id=4
> 
> They don't suffer from the instabilities of the presently dominant
> cantilevered designs.
> 
> Terry

I am very interested in those too, but I hear they have their own
scaling problems. Still I would like to see more R&D money spent on them.

Harry 
 

> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Harry Veeder <hvee...@ncf.ca> wrote:
> > It might be interesting to imagine how wind power might harnessed
> >
> > without rotating blades of any kind.
> >
> > eg. If wind can have a chilling effect, could this effect
> >
> > be harnessed to generate a significant amount of electrical power?
> >
> > Harry
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> > From: Horace Heffner <hheff...@mtaonline.net>
> >
> > Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2009 10:51 pm
> >
> > Subject: Re: [Vo]:The PickensPlan website
> >
> >>
> >> On Jan 6, 2009, at 1:18 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
> >>
> >> > I wonder if increasing the mass of the blades would help by
> >> adding/
> >> > increasing
> >> > the flywheel effect? It would certainly even out the very short
> >> > wind gusts, and
> >> > that would decrease the criticality of response time of other
> >> > systems. Of course
> >> > heavy blades would be harder to get moving initially, and hence
> >> > would probably
> >> > be better suited to higher wind environments.
> >>
> >>
> >> It would make braking more difficult and thus decrease the shut
> >> down
> >> velocity or increase brake cost and mass. Also, I think a lot is
> >> invested in keeping blades light, as it reduces the centrifugal
> >> strain on them.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> Horace Heffner
> >> http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
> >>
> >> < BR>>
> >>
> >>
> 
> 

Reply via email to