mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
> In reply to  Kyle Mcallister's message of Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:53:48 -0700 
> (PDT):
>>
>> /Can we build a damn thing that will make a cup of
>> warm coffee or tea?/ If not, why not???
> 
> I suspect not. CF (or LENR) is finicky, and no one is yet certain of the 
> precise
> requirements (though there are now a few claims of complete replicability).
> Those who can achieve it have been trying for quite a while to get it right.
> Even then, I think a reasonably well equipped lab is a prerequisite. It's not
> something you can do in your garage, and expect to work.

There is something else as well.

There are some reproducible, repeatable experiments which work, if not
every time, then a good fraction of the time.  But reliability is not
what stands in the way of making a tea heater.  There are two other
problems with making a gadget which does something useful.

First, the repeatable experiments all produce very low-grade heat; it's
hard to do much with it beyond just detect it.

Second, and more important, the same bugaboo that plagues hot fusion is
at work here:  The best of the wet-cell CF experiments is nowhere near
breakeven.

With that said, I should add that gas-phase CF at room temperature,
which operates without a large external energy source, *might* produce
enough heat to run a Stirling engine -- but I don't think so. As I said,
these experiments produce low-grade heat; I don't think the heat output
of the gas-phase experiments is large enough to do that.

Reply via email to