Thanks for posting that. 
I forwarded the Assis quote to another group.

Harry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Taylor J. Smith" <tj...@centurytel.net>
Date: Monday, June 8, 2009 5:05 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Time Dilation and relativity. Was Relativistic magnetic  
fields and time

> 
> Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> 
> ... time dilation isn't really just a simple number.
> 
> Hi All,       6-8-09
> 
> Here are some thoughts on time dilation.
> 
> Jack Smith
> 
> -----------
> 
> Quoting from "Relational Mechanics" by Andre K. T. Assis, 1999
> (This book can be purchased at Amazon.com.)
> 
> p. 132
> 
> "It is usually stated that this dilation of the proper 
> time of a body in motion has been proven by experiments
> in which unstable mesons are accelerated and move at
> high velocities in particle accelerators.
> 
> In these experiments it is observed that the half-lives
> ... of these accelerated mesons are greater than the
> half-lives of mesons at rest in the laboratory.
> 
> But this is not the only interpretation of these
> experiments.  It can be equally argued that these 
> experiments only show that the half-lives of the
> unstable mesons depend on their accelerations ...
> 
> An analogy ... Suppose two identical pendulum clocks
> at rest on the earth, marking the same time at sea level
> and running at the same pace,  We then carry one
> of them to a high mountain, keep it there for several
> hours, and bring it back to sea level at the location of
> the other clock.
> 
> Comparing the two clocks it is observed that the clock 
> which was carried to the top of the mountain is delayed
> relative to the one which stayed all the time at sea 
> level.  This is the observational fact.
> 
> It can be interpreted saying that time ran more slowly
> for the clock at the top of the mountain.  Or it can be
> interpreted by saying that time ran equally to both clocks,
> but that the period of oscillation ... depends on the
> gravitational field of the earth ...  As the gravitational
> field is weaker at the top of the mountain than at sea level,
> the clock which stayed on the mountain is delayed as
> compared with the one at sea level ..."
> 
> -------------------

Reply via email to