On Jul 8, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:

Edmund Storms wrote:

And thus we see the basic flaw in wind generation. Unless a backup
source of power is in place and can be connected to an active grid,
wind power is not practical.

My comment clearly applied to the US. The situation in Europe is different, as Jed notes. Europe has invested in its distribution system because most transportation of goods and people is carried by electric trains. The US has not made this investment because most transportation here is by cars and trucks, which do not use electric power. As a result, the US went down a different road compared to Europe and is now paying the price.

Ed

This is incorrect. EPRI and European power companies that have a lot experience with wind power say that most present-day distribution systems can accommodate up to 20% wind power with little or no additional equipment. They say fluctuations in demand are a much bigger problem than fluctuations in output from wind. Over a large geographic area, wind output is highly predictable, even several days in advance, so it can be planned for.

Also, it degrades slowly and in small increments compared to other power sources. In some ways wind is more predictable and stable than other sources. When something goes wrong with a coal or gas fired plant, a large chunk of capacity goes off line immediately and in an unplanned manner. When a nuclear power plant SCRAMs you can lose half the power in the state. In contrast, if the wind is not quite as strong as predicted, the difference is minor. If there is very little wind, they know about it hours or days in advance and they can plan for it.

Having said that, Terry is quite right that putting 4 GW of wind power in one place would be an engineering nightmare. Putting 4 GW of nuclear power in one place would be an economic nightmare. Nukes are only good for baseline, 24-hour electricity. As far as I know, the only place with such concentrated power is in Japan, where the whole country is in a tight grid so they can distribute that much power. The biggest in the world is Kashiwazaki-kariwa, 8 GW, owned by Tokyo Electric Power, which is smack in the middle of nowhere in Niigata, far from Tokyo:

http://www2.jnes.go.jp/atom-db/en/general/atomic/ke02a13/info_h.html

This was hit by an earthquake in July 2007, taking out a large fraction of all of the electricity in Japan. It is fully back on line now, I believe.

The power lines from Niigata to Tokyo are awesome. They are among the biggest with the highest voltage in the world. I saw an NHK program about the construction of them. Maintenance is done by helicopter.

- Jed


Reply via email to