Wow. Think big, and you'll be pleased :-). A massive(when more massive it is, it could be relatively cheaper), government sponsored & (partially?) backed, reconversion to ecologically friendly (and also very cheap in the medium/long term, and completely sustainable) energy alternatives. That's the way to go, IMO. I would love to see something like that happening, in USA or in another country.
I hope they consider the "light metal as an energy storage" and "hidrogen on demand" proposals. I would like to hear about its disadvantages, and also about other methods of energy storage. Also, I think that an analysis of methods and technologies for the conversion of existing explosion motors and cars to hydrogen on demand, as this is probably more viable, faster, and energy savvy than the introduction of brand new hydrogen cars, is a very good idea. Best regards, thanks for the info. Mauro Horace Heffner wrote: > http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=115210 > > http://tinyurl.com/lmuggx > > Best regards, > > Horace Heffner > http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/ > > > > > >
