On Jul 28, 2009, at 2:55 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
Is the planet-boosting flyby anomaly:
http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.4184
an indication of insufficient integration resolution of the Matrix?,
Hi,
More likely, indications pointing to the inadequacy of our current
theory and understanding, or lack of understanding, of gravitation.
http://www.fourmilab.ch/fourmilog/archives/2006-04/000683.html
Reginald Cahill bore hole anomalies are worth including in this
list, in
my opinion. And also maybe the related anomalies posted some time
ago in
this list, regarding rotating cryogenic rings.
I've studied the Pioneer and flyby anomalies, to a certain extent, and
according to Anderson et al (whose papers are fortunately in
arxiv), the
Pioneer anomalies could be regarded as some case of flyby anomaly.
This
is interesting, because the magnitude of the Pioneer anomaly is
apparently not dependant on distance; so it is probably just an
anomaly
in momentum transfer when leaving the solar system, aided by Jupiter's
or Neptune's gravity.
I've studied these things a bit too. See:
http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/PioneerAnom.pdf
Here's my take on the Pioneer Anomaly: "An underlying cause for the
Pioneer Anomaly has been proposed: a Lorentz force from the ambient
gravimagnetic field of the galaxy. This force has the desirable
characteristics in that it remains relatively constant with distance
from earth, diminishes long range as satellite velocity diminishes,
and produces small annual doppler variations. Verifying the galactic
gravimagnetic field as the cause of the Pioneer anomaly requires a
complete modeling of all orbital characteristics and track correction
methods, taking into account the existence of gravimagnetics."
There is a lot more work to be done. I have more things in the fire
than a 6 armed blacksmith, so I don't know when I'll get back to it.
I think the flyby anomaly is likely the combined result of
gravimagnetic Lorentz force and gravimagnetic induction caused by
rotation of the local planet's gravimagnetic field. This is just a
weak deduction on my part - a lot of work needed there to. Most of
the earth's gravimagnetic field comes from nuclear spin, not just
earth's rotation, so work has to be done quantifying that aspect of
the field.
I think unexpected quadrupole and octupole EM radiation may be the
result of the fact that black holes are not truly black, because
virtual photons, unlike real photons, do not carry gravitational
charge and thus black holes have powerful magnetic fields in addition
to powerful gravimagnetic fields, and these fields radiate as the
black holes interact. These fields are due to spin alignment of
particles within the black hole, as well as mass circular motion
inside the black hole. The interactions of nearby black holes, even
very small ones, produce EM quadrupole radiation in addition to
graviphoton quadrupole radiation. In the centers of galaxies many
black holes interact simultaneously. I also, based on my
gravimagnetic theory, predict that gravity waves that shrink
dimensions will not be found, but that EM signatures of black hole
mergers already exist in ELF geomagnetic data currently logged,
waiting to be found by some eager graduate student.
All highly speculative, yet based on a robust and detailed theory
with which quantified predictions aplenty can be made and tested,
the gravimagnetic theory:
http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/FullGravimag.pdf
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
