I'm interested in participating with others to develop and market cold fusion experimental kits that could be sold and used to show one or more of the known low-energy nuclear reactions.

There are a number of possibilities I'll toss out for reaction. The details are not important, the concept it.

(1) very small codeposition cell. possibly sealed, limited amount of heavy water in it and palladium chloride and whatever, and two appropriate electrodes. Small size and limited gas evolution could then allow sealed operation even without recombination. Results: maybe heat, but, possibly more practical, the cell would contain a small piece of CR-39 close to the cathode. The cells would be cheap, many identical. Some would be controls, by coded number, with ordinary water instead of heavy water. The user would run the cell for a recorded time and current profile. An instrumentation package might be rented by the experimenter, with programmable power supply and various controls and sensors and recording of data on an ordinary computer through a USB interface. The sealed and numbered cells would be sent to a lab for helium analysis and etching and photography of the CR-39. The experimenter would cover the costs of all this, and would get the results. And the results would also be shared.

(2) a kit to culture the bacterium deinococcus radiodurans in the presence of Mn-55. The resulting cultures and controls would be sent to a lab for Mossbauer spectroscopy using a Co-57 gamma source, which is exquisitely specific for the detection of Fe-57, claimed by Vyosotski to be found in such cultures (ACS LENR Sourcebook and many ICCF Conference papers).

(3) any other ideas for a minimally expensive and simple experimental set-up that would demonstrate a LENR effect?

Science fair kits, perhaps. Uniform, sell a few thousand (cheap enough, interested people would buy more than several). If it works, it would become impossible to continue to deny reproducibility.

One of the most cogent of criticisms of LENR work has been that, with few exceptions, no two experimental reports were of the same setup. This would massively address that problem, and be self-supporting.

If it doesn't work, if this is too difficult, I start to wonder if maybe I've been duped.... Codeposition is alleged to be 100%, and fast. Okay, is it? It's alleged to be difficult, with many unstated but necessary conditions. Okay, what conditions, exactly, and why couldn't these be controlled precisely in a mass-produced kit? Need purity? Fine, whatever purity is needed; the quantities in each cell would be low, that's one reason why codeposition and very small cells. No bulk palladium needed, only enough palladium chloride for a thin layer, fully loaded, for maybe as little as a few minutes or few hours of operation.

And most people interested in cold fusion seem to have avoided the Vyosotskii findings. Biological transmutation? "Let me go sit on the other side of the room, I don't want to be seen next to this guy." As it happens, however, I was familiar with Momssbauer spectroscopy and saw Vyosotskii's reported results as high certainty for identification of Fe-57. Which should not be in that culture if the bacterium isn't transmuting it, period. I think most people look at Mossbauer spectroscopy as just another technique, with so many possible artifacts.... I don't think so.

Radiodurans is famous for extremely high radiation resistance. It's conceivable that a highly radiation resistant bacterium could evolve a means of, to speculate, forming a tetrahedral symmetric condensate using a protein to confine trace deuterium in normal water, thus creating the fusion-facile collapsed TSC as theorized by Takahashi. It's no more impossible than for fusion to happen in palladium deuteride. Not expected, for sure! Neither one. Except by people like Fleischmann, and, apparently, Vyosotskii. Fleischmann has told us what he was looking for and why. Anyone know about Vyosotskii?



Most cold fusion research has been oriented toward scaling up the process, making the effect stronger. This approach doesn't need that. If the cells are cheap enough, it wouldn't even need to be very reliable, just moderately so.

Anyone else interested in this?

Reply via email to