Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances 
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/


--- On Tue, 10/20/09, Mark Iverson <zeropo...@charter.net> wrote:

> From: Mark Iverson <zeropo...@charter.net>
> Subject: [Vo]: RF improves molecular interactions...
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Tuesday, October 20, 2009, 11:30 PM
> Who was it that was using RF to
> enhance the CF/LENR reaction???
> 
> This from PhysOrg.com... 
> http://www.physorg.com/news175281818.html
> 
> "As the authors report in an upcoming issue of Physical
> Review A, the radio-frequency (RF) radiation
> could serve as a second "knob," in addition to the more
> traditionally used magnetic fields, for
> controlling how atoms in an ultracold gas interact."
> 
> And they state, "By adding RF radiation of the right
> frequency..."
Rf is seemingly always described in terms of "frequency". In other words the rf 
source broadcasts at so and so a frequency.
Shortly after 1920 the Multiple Wave Oscillator (MWO) was developed by Georges 
Lakhovsky in France and operated on the principle of an objects resonance to 
very wide bandwidth unmodulated radio wave. Later Rife and and another French 
inventor used plasma tubes in coordination with rf. For the (resonant) voltage 
source I employ it is totally safe to touch the ending neon high voltage plates 
as the ending polar capacity of the body will then add to the neon discharge 
intensity of the bulb attached to that ending plate.(No shock is noted) This 
procedure uses only a single plate and interfaces the body with the ground 
return path of the neon discharge, so that if one removes one feet from the 
floor while being seated on a chair while receiving the neon plate influence, 
the neon discharge intensity is reduced. Here in this example however only the 
rf from the neons and oppositely phased plate voltages placed closely together 
are used for rf detection some 10
 - 12 ft away by oscilloscope connection to various coils. The intervening 
plate capacity between the neons attached to 180 phased 60 hz series resonant 
high induction coils has the effect of a "current limitation" being established 
between the resonant potentials by the intervening capacity value. If this were 
not in place the bulbs would instead blink rapidly. Apparently the volume of 
current being procurred between the 180 phased resonant potentials with a 
direct plasma short between them is such that when that when it ignites, the 
source of its voltage is quenched or extinguished. Not only this but the 
amperage consumption of the circuit is reduced Q squared fold with the full 
reactive current limitation of the circuit in place made by this short. Another 
very interesting option is to use ferrite as this necessary ballasting for the 
process. I have in the past used small 3/8 in blocks of ferrite as insulators 
for an electrolysis cell using steel
 rulers as the electrodes. The electrolysis itself can have its voltage source 
for rectification obtained by higher amperage 180 phased series resonant 
circuits. In the past using this approach I was able to record rf from the 
electrolysis vessel itself, meaning that the radio waves easily proceed through 
the water itself. This rf effect however now seems to be elusive, but I will 
eventually seek to reconstruct this with a water cell.
     Even a larger 4*6 inch by 1 inch ferrite magnet can be chosen for the neon 
ballasting, and rf recorded from its surface areas. I will later show the VERY 
LOW resonant frequencies obtained when using ferrite toroids as the receiving 
MWO coils.
     For the receiving coils I have first chosen 1 and 2 ft tesla secondaries 
for this first MWO demo. The smaller one recieves 350,000 hz, in ~ agreement 
with its quarter wave value, but the longer secondary appears to vibrate slower 
at its half wave value near 100,000  hz. This is my first you tube video and I 
was not familiar with the new camera operation, so things are a little shaky 
here.
http://www.youtube.com/user/harvich#p/a/0/k10BRK-DldAh 

     My explanation for this MWO effect is that each of the sending high 
induction coils containing 8.6 miles of 23 gauge wire has an extremely low 
natural resonant frequency. During the neon discharge to ground a sensor spiral 
coil recording the high induction coils 60 hz wave will show a  rf high 
frequency ringdown occupying at least one quarter of the 60 hz cycle. The sweep 
rate of the scope can be turned up to reveal the higher frequency of the 
ringdown itself, showing itself to be ~ 3600 hz on the first testing. This 
value in fact is exactly 66% of the quarterwavelength value for 8.6 miles of 
wire, showing that the coils natural resonant frequency is reduced by the 
internal interwinding capacity. In fact any of these TC secondary MWO receiving 
coils will have its vibration reduced by the addition of a globular top end 
polar capacity. A certain conundrum has been seen concerning the addition of 
capacity with other inductors in relation to the stated
 20 pf internal scope capacity. This can be shown later in further 
investigations.
For now let me simply conclude that the source of the rf being of a very low 
standing wave created on the  70 lb coils themselves, all the receiving coils 
are vibrating at much high harmonics, and perhaps this is a method for making 
the so called wide band rf emmision.
Sincerely HDN
     
> Resonance, resonance, resonance... Its all about harmonic
> interaction.  Most of science deals with
> getting interactions to occur using brute force; but find
> the right frequency and it all comes
> together and appears effortless. But we're dealing with
> such high frequencies that finding the right
> one can be like finding the proverbial needle in the
> haystack! And there are likely more than one
> frequency involved in the molecule, so what's harmonic with
> one is likely discordant with another...
> What's that old mathematical term... "Least Common
> Multiple".
> 
> -Mark
> 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.5.422 / Virus Database: 270.14.23/2447 - Release
> Date: 10/20/09 03:55:00
> 
> 
>


Reply via email to