Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
I'd like to call attention to an image that is in the Galileo
report. Actually it may be two images, or it's one with some
distortion in one version.
http://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/projects/tgp/2007TGP/2007TGP-Report.shtml
This is a good report, as I think I said previously. I just read it
again. Regarding this sentence:
"However, sectioning and photographing CR-39 is, apparently, a
Herculean feat. None of the SPAWAR researchers or the project
replicators has attempted this."
The Bemporad presentation on micro and nano instruments that I noted
earlier can do this kind of thing. I gather it is automated and easy
to use -- not Herculean. The capabilities seem awesome to me. I said
"it would be nifty to apply these instruments to cold fusion." This
is the sort of thing I had in mind.
The ability to do something like this illustrates the advantage of
having buckets of money to do this research. (I suppose that a person
buckets of money would use a solid state detector instead of CR39.
Perhaps you would do both . . .)
Ed Storms and some others have told me that if buckets of money start
pouring into the field, and the money is used by smart people, they
may soon leave the present group of researchers behind. If the money
goes to less-than-smart people or people without clear goals, it will
be a repeat of the NHE project. As McKubre said, that project
deserved to be shut down.
Bemporad is here:
<http://iccf15.frascati.enea.it/ICCF15-PRESENTATIONS/S10_O5_Bemporad.pdf>http://iccf15.frascati.enea.it/ICCF15-PRESENTATIONS/S10_O5_Bemporad.pdf
- Jed
