Rick always writes what he means and means what he says. He's the guy who sells the Bedini kits, there's a 10 coil monopole kit that they have released, for instance. http://rpmgt.org/order.html The Bedini Monopole Energizer kit was built by a friend and he came to the conclusion that it's only for learning-purposes, and can be taken further (it's possible that mr. Friedrich has upped his ante and knows and understands more about the Bedini monopole tech - and that the 10-pole energizer would be quite worth looking into. But at that price? Not sure how much machining something like that would cost, but they mention it'd be in the tens of thousands of usd? on the page..) Rick also features on the Energy From The Vacuum series as a spectator of Bedini showing his stuff, I think in EFTV12 perchance. The detail here that (I guess) matters, is that Bedini chose Friedrich to make the kits available via, and Friedrich also sells the Renaissance charger devices, and has relations to Bedini's EnergenX -company. It's not a random guy shooting the breeze on a mailinglist, if I'm not completely mistaken, Friedrich maintains some of the monopole lists and is in general a guy who would know what Bedini is up to, and what's next. Looking at what Friedrich wrote about 1/3 of the amps going into the secondary - he is quite probably talking about the secondary batteries that get charged while the primary batteries provide the juice for the transformation process.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence <sa...@pobox.com> wrote: > > > On 12/16/2009 12:07 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: >> >> At 11:00 AM 12/16/2009, Esa Ruoho wrote: > > No he didn't. Esa Ruoho quoted "rickfriedrich" from the bedini_monopole_3 > forum. It was "Rick" who was experimenting with the Bedini motor described > here, not Esa, and AFAIK Rick isn't on Vortex. > > Rick's batteries are apparently magic, if I understood this quote; he says a > "good number of amps" were "constantly" being drawn [from the batteries?] > but the batteries remained charged; I don't understand that. He must have > meant something other than how I interpreted his words. >>> I was running the system on smaller used batteries for days and they >>> remained charged even though a good number of amps were constantly >>> being drawn and the meter was showing 1/3rd of the amps going back >>> into the secondary. >> Take a hint. Fine to set it up and start it with batteries, but >> batteries are tricky to monitor, they don't easily show the exact state >> of the charge. Put together a capacitor bank with enough depth (farads) >> to cover the draw phase, and charge it up to the battery voltage. Then >> once you are running, take the battery out of the circuit. You can then >> directly monitor the power storage by monitoring the capacitor voltage. >> No guessing. You will know right away if you are over unity, and how >> much, or, if you are under unity, exactly how much you are under unity. >> >> The larger the capacitance, the more even the available voltage will be. >> I'd think of making it really large, so you would not want to directly >> connect the battery to the capacitor, that can melt wires! You'd charge >> through a resistor. You could make all this part of one circuit, with a >> switch on the battery, or you could eliminate the battery and use a >> power supply which you then, once the thing is running, disconnect. >> >> Unless, of course, you want a "demonstration" that looks reasonably good >> through the idea that a battery couldn't possible last this long. As >> another pointed out, pulse charging can make batteries last much longer >> than we might expect. But a capacitor won't lie. >> > >
