Response from Prof. Holmlid,
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 23:35:24 +0100, Leif Holmlid <holm...@chalmers.se> wrote: >Dear Mr. Spaandonk, > >I am well aware of the studies and results of Mills. > >The model we use to understand our results does not require any new >quantum mechanics or similar devices. The results are rather simple and >multiple energy levels are not involved, only one level exists. However, the >material is quite complex since it is condensed matter, apparently both >superconductive and superfluid. I will read more on your web site, >thank you for sending me the information. > >Yours sincerely, Leif Holmlid > >At 23:17 2010-01-04, you wrote: >>Dear Professor, >> >>It appears to me that "inverted" Rydberg states implies an inversion of the >>primary quantum number to create fractional states. This has been done my >>Randell Mills (www.blacklightpower.com) and also in a variant >>thereof by me (see >>http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/New-hydrogen.html ). >>Mills model is based upon the creation of "virtual" charge through trapped >>photons. My model is based upon De Broglie wave wrapping around multiple times >>before it reconnects with itself. >> >>Both models result in 137 sub-Bohr states, however the radius is different. In >>Mills model the radius goes as the inverted quantum number, in my >>model it goes >>as the square of the quantum number. >> >>Mills has done quite a bit of experimental work since the inception of his >>theory in 1986, and reports on that work can be found on his >>extensive website, >>where an online version of his book can also be downloaded. >> >>Regards, >> >>Robin van Spaandonk >> >>http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html > >Professor Leif Holmlid >Department of Chemistry >Atmospheric Science >University of Gothenburg >SE-412 96 Goteborg >Sweden > >phone +46-31-786 9076 >fax +46-31-772 3107 Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
