Fro Abd: ...
> In other words, Bushnell's approach is sound, whether or not his assessment > of W-L theory is sound. Agreed. I wish Mr. Bushnell & Co. happy hunting. I hope the count-down had begun. ;-) > I'd really like to see a decent explanation of W-L theory that addresses the > obvious problems; what I've seen from W-L themselves simply avoids the whole > rate issue, that, in the absence of a strict 1:1 final step, the > intermediates should be found at higher concentrations than the final > product, i.e., helium or other ash. > > W-L theory, of course, has much wider implications. If neutrons can be > generated from protons like that, this opens up a whole new world of > possibilities. FWIW I recently googled the following article on W-L: http://www.i-sis.org.uk/Widom-Larsen.php Not sure if this article addresses some of the criticisms adequately or not. Just a personal comment here: It was my understanding that W-L is supposed to address (theoretically) a whole slew of unexpected/unexplainable "transmutations" that have been detected from numerous independent experiments. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
