Ok,I was clued in about Barker patents and others, Rex research [http://www.rexresearch.com/coldfusn/nukwast.htm#brown] reveal evidence for acceleration of decay vs delay. I am interested now in what types of decay are involved And how measured. I am ignoring Gamma type since we have so few dead researchers but some He-4/Alpha is detected and am also focused on Beta since I assume the excess heat anomaly will work at least as well with tritium as deuterium. Reifenschweiler effect is not presently associated with excess heat but the 15nm titanium clusters loaded with tritium indicate conditions similar to Rayney nickel loaded with hydrogen are present. Not to imply that radioactive decay is in anyway needed to generate heat but rather that use of tritium in place of deuterium could act like dye in the water to help us solve the anomalous heat. Note I still feel fusion is a side effect or result of an interim ashless chemistry/oscillation between h1 & h2 courtesy of delta in Casimir force that increases the energy, heat and relativistic environment that increases the probability of fusion. I am still searching for answers regarding accelerated and delayed Beta, do they mean a measuring device counts fewer particles while the Radioactive material is being stimulated? If the effect of the Casimir geometry is relativistic as I am predicting would the radiation or particles Received always appear slower just like the photon clock in the spaceship vs a stationary observer - regardless of which frame is accelerated the clock Always looks slower from a remote observation? My position is that the rate of emissions seen by a remote stationary observer from a tritium atom near luminal velocity would be slowed and when the atom is decelerated to the same frame as the observer we would find the half life increased from the observers perspective just like the twin paradox. The relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect however decelerates the atom relative to us the observers outside the cavity, We in effect become the more accelerated frame and the atoms will appear to have a shortened half life from our perspective when they return to our frame BUT the clock rate we observe of emissions while the atoms are in this decelerated frame should still appear slower just like the accelerated frame? Regards Fran
Rex Research http://www.rexresearch.com/coldfusn/nukwast.htm#brown Nuclear Waste Remediation/Transmutation Patents
