>> A New article : Spooky Eyes: Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum >> Entanglement >> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=human-eyes-entanglement >> >> Could this be a threat to the communication industry? Like big oil >> opposition to free energy the thought of free communication must be a >> concern to some. >> Presently the communication is only temporary with a record that only >> stands around 100 miles between sender and receiver. >> >> A question that I just have to ask is "could the entangled particles >> remain adjacent in other dimensions while being displaced spatially?"
If for "adjacent" you mean that at least one of the coordinate values that define the position of the particles in a given higher dimensional manifold are the same for both particles, the answer is yes. I suppose that could be named "dimensional adjacency", "hyper dimensional adjacency", or something like that. The idea would be: all the points that lay in a given n-dimensional manifold would be "adjacent" with respect to any n+m (m>0) orthogonal axis to that plane. > > That's a very good question. A semi-reflection on a higher dimensional > plane(or volumetric cross section, btw) will be shown as a spatial > displacement in the other dimensions, while the coordinates of both > resultant particles on that specific dimensional axis will remain the > same. > All this is intrinsicly related to the way quantum entanglement really > works(which is something that has intrigued me for years), and the precise > answer must be sought there, I think. > > Regards, > Mauro > >> Regards >> Fran >> >> > > >
