"Below ground state helium" turns up zero hits on google. which is curious . in light of the assertion that 'physics is almost complete'.
Has this possibility not been addressed adequately ? IOW .does anyone recall if this (putative) species of fractional helium has been mentioned by Mills/BLP or by others? . and if not, why not? It could be a better candidate for a portion of 'dark matter,' if it existed in 'deep redundancy,' than the usual suspects. Matter of fact, it is fairly illogical, as Mills asserts, to suggest that 'hydrino-hydride' can make up a proportion of dark matter, yet 'heliinos' or pycnohelium, do not exist. Helium is the second most abundant element in the universe, accounting for 24-25% of the elemental mass of our galaxy (aside from dark matter). I intentionally phrased that statement in this way because the normal view is that hydrogen is more prevalent (90+%) in the number of atoms, is misleading in terms of actual mass, and ultimately in terms of relative importance. If your intent is to make a point, then helium is clearly the most neglected atomic-molecule in the universe, and if it was to be a preferential product of 'redundancy' who is to say that it is not more prevalent than hydrogen, given that dark matter itself is the wild-card in terms of total mass . and/or that LERN, as a QM reaction operating over billions of years, would favor pycnohelium "as the end of the line", over any other species. :-) Jones
