Before anyone spends *too* much time trying to figure out /how/ it works, I think it's worth investing a little more effort in wondering *if* it works. It's easy enough to find a conventional explanation for the effect; it's right there on the web page:
> Meanwhile, they are working on perfecting the technology and moving it > into production. On Aug. 21, 2010 they will be having a demonstration > in Arizona, USA, for people who are interested in pre-investment to > help capitalize the further development of the technology. So, there's no delivery date for a production model (they're still working on that), there's no replication, there's no sensible explanation for how it works, but right now, today, they're selling shares. OK..... And of course let us not forget that this demonstration vehicle also has a gas tank, loaded with conventional gasoline, which we are *told* is never refilled because it's hardly ever used, only used, in fact, for starting and for going up steep hills. For sure... On 08/25/2010 04:41 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > francis wrote: > >> http://pesn.com/2010/08/17/9501689_QA_Frederick_Wells_VP_Future_Energy_Concepts_Inc/ >> >> >> I like the resonance scheme between nested tubes > > Is there any reason we should take this report seriously? Any > independent confirmation, for example? > > - Jed
