In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:26:46 -0400: Hi, [snip] >But I'll also be looking for visible light, remember when I asked if >anyone had done that? With a microscope, in the dark? I'll also have >a piezoelectric sensor attached to the cell. So maybe I'll get lucky. >Light and sound won't prove "nuclear," but I don't care. If I can >show that sound and/or light are *associated* with the reaction, I >then may have a way to determine that the reaction is taking place >without waiting for film to be exposed and developed.
You should look for IR. That is always associated with excess heat (by definition). Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
