seattle truth said on Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:54:10 -0800
YES!! MAGICAL FREE ENERGY FROM THE FOURTH DIMENSION!!!
Great solution. So if you were stealing energy from the fourth dimension,
does that mean that soon that dimension will run out of energy? Or is the
fourth dimension magical and has no laws of conservation?
>Not at all - in fact the 4th dimension should be considered unphysical
except for the briefest period between virtual particle creation and
annihilation when this dimension intersects our 3D spatial plane. My posit
is this sea of virtual particle/ vacuum fluctuations are a known energy
source normally considered unexploitable but it clearly does act as the
energy source behind the random motion of gas atoms. And for those who
ascribe to the Puthoff model of the atom it restores energy from spontaneous
emission because it imparts a pressure - etheric wind if you will- that
keeps the electron displaced behind the nucleus by a minimal time/distance.
This chaotic energy normally averages to zero so quickly and locally there
is no physical method to exploit it at the macro level from a single
inertial frame, nor would NORMAL relativistic methods provide any practical
solution. My inspiration came from Jan Naudts when he said the hydrino is
actually relativistic hydrogen but because the hydrino exists inside a
skeletal catalyst Jan was obviously not talking about the spatial velocity
of hydrogen being ejected from the suns corona..He was saying you can have
hydrogen at relativistic velocities inside a pourus block of nickel and
aluminum - this would mean the hydrogen can remain spatially stationary
relative to the hydrogen and hardware outside the reactor while existing in
a different equivalent inertial frame inside the catalyst. Because of
suppression the equivalent acceleration builds much faster than normal mass
at the inverse cube of the spacing between the plates - I do agree that
longer wavelengths are treated differently in a Casimir cavity but in a
relativistic interpretation they are NOT displaced, instead they are forced
to slow down below our inertial frame (negative acceleration) and simply
look shorter from our perspective outside the cavity.
Furthermore, he says :"*The importance of the hydrogenic groundstate is
fundamental to the physics of the quantum and is embodied in the
relationship between the displacement measurements of the Classical Electron
Radius {Re=ke2/mec2 =αhc/2πmec2}, the Electronic Compton Radius {Rc=h/2πme
c=Re/α} and the above derived First Bohr Radius {RB1=Re/α2=h2εo/πmee2}; all
as functions of the interaction probability between matter and light in the
DIMENSIONLESS Electromagnetic Finestructure Constant {Alpha=α=2πke2/hc=e2/2ε
ohc}."*
*
Lane - I am not discounting your work, I don't have the math muscle to do
that even if I wanted to, but I suspect it is incomplete.
The claims regarding changes in half life of gas atoms diffused in these
catalytic powders confirmed for me the relativistic foundation proposed by
Naudts. The math you have already accomplished may need to further include
an equivalent form of Gamma where V^2 is instead derived from the Casimir
formula.
*
I solved all of this in my new paper,
http://www.wbabin.net/ntham/davis.pdf starting
on page 27, where it shows that the fine structure constant is an aggregate
and this trio of lengths can be directly divided through basic algebra..
There is no ground state radius below .529e-15, because there is no
transitional subset for it to transfer to.
- Again your statements are true for the local observer but if a
relativistic environment exists then a differential can be accomplished
between our frame and a negative inertial frame that is equivalent to going
below those dimensions from our perspective.
Best Regards
Fran
