Dear Jones, Have you read my answer to Ed Storms's message you have cited here? I do not agree with him regarding the main points. The things are always much more complicated than they seem to be.
Re your point 1) what do you know about this nano-Ni work- what when was accomplished? Do you know from sure sources- the chronology of the events- who has contacted whom and when? This is anyway a secondary discussion as long as the device works and theory will be found sooner or later. I will ask Randy Mills what he thinks about this. Peter On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > * > http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/01/19/rossi-and-focardi-lenr-device-probably-real-with-credit-to-piantelli/ > *<http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/01/19/rossi-and-focardi-lenr-device-probably-real-with-credit-to-piantelli/> > > But he is still giving the most credit to Piantelli, when probably that is > completely wrong, and the three things which led to this breakthrough were(in > order of importance): > > 1) The previous Rossi/Leonardo TEG work with nano-nickel > > 2) The published work of Randell Mills > > 3) The published work of Arata/Zhang, Kitamura, etc > > Obviously when you are a smart guy like Rossi, you find an anomaly in one > field (thermoelectrics) with the same Raney nickel you had discovered as > being so energetic that it caused two fires in you Lab … and then, as any > good experimenter will do - you go to the internet to look for help or > understanding in unrelated fields, then 2) and 3) above are the most > authoritative help out there. > > Next, you apply what you have learned to a field that became bifurcated in > the mid 1990s, due to ego problems, and WOW, suddenly you become the hero > of that unrelated field. > > IOW – Rossi had his “Goodyear moment” at the expense of all of those in > LENR, including Piantelli, who refused to acknowledge the gigantic advance > of Mills, who himself was too egotistical to want to believe that he got a > major part of CQM wrong – and that in the end the secret was nothing more > or less than a subset of the “cold fusion” field that he dreaded so much… > > A short and fractured (fractal?) history of LENR in a brief reappraisal… > > Jones >
