They have a complex technology, needs a lot of development, can be replicated but no easily. Take please a look to the papers at the BlackLightPower website. They will demonstrate later this year their CIHT technology- it generates electricity. I have worked 40 years in the chemical industry nad I have an understanding of the problems they have to solve before becoming a very important source of energy. My best friend Mike Carrell who has also worked for long years -electrotechnics, advent of elctronics also sees Randy's technology as The Solution Peter
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:27 PM, noone noone <thesteornpa...@yahoo.com>wrote: > Then why does BLP not produce a product? > > They seem to have had a rock solid easily to replicate technology for a > decade. > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> > > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Thu, January 20, 2011 10:30:34 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Deuterium kills the reaction? > > Dear Jones, > > Randy Mills would not agree with your assertion. > He is waiting for the scientific analysis (that of Bologna professors) to > make an opinion of the demonstration and the generator. > > If hydrinos have played a role, they can be found with the method described > e..g. in this paper: > RL Mills et many: "Commercializable Power Source from Forming New States of > Hydrogen" Int J. Hydrogen Energy vol 34 (2009) 573-614 > > One of the greaest advantages of Mills upon "us" is that he understand > what happens in his systems. He has a first class theory- that predicts. > Second class theory prohibits, third class describes, explans what has > happened> What kind of theory do we have? A "good" point is that we have > many! > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> *From:* noone noone >> >> >> >> Ø I don't think there is any RF generator. >> >> >> >> The purpose of the Rossi “black box” is said to be a secret, but if it >> were merely a DC power supply for a resistive heater, then you would be >> implying a planned intent to deceive the audience, which is not impossible, >> but unlikely. >> >> >> >> Ø I do not see any need for an RF generator. I think the system can self >> sustain if the temperature is hot enough, but the problem is that there >> could be a runaway explosion if that happens. >> >> Again, the need for RF is NOT as a heater, but as a means of spin >> flipping hydrogen to attain negative temperature in this (highly >> speculative) hypothesis. Rossi cannot mention RF as an input in the patent, >> since RF has been previously patented as a way to heat a hydrogen nuclear >> reactor. >> >> >> >> And since Rossi is probably unaware of the quasi-BEC modality (assuming >> that it could be accurate to some extent) then he probably thinks the >> advantage of RF over other input is the great unknown mystery, and which he >> admits to not comprehending. >> >> >> >> If it turns out to indeed be RF input, then we can say that he found out >> that it is advantageous through trial and error, yet apparently thinks that >> it works for the same reason that it is used in prior-art, in tokomaks, etc. >> So he could be right for the wrong reason. >> >> >> >> Although my underlying hypothesis of operation - with the quasi-BEC - is >> admittedly “way out there” on the fringe of the fringe, it is pretty clear >> that Rossi has done what Randell Mills could not do. >> >> >> >> In effect, you seem to be saying that Rossi has invented nothing more than >> a better version of the Mills’ reactor. That is most unlikely, since Mills >> has not gotten his to run in a continuous mode for long enough to begin >> placement in the grid plants of his licensees, and he is far better funded. >> >> >> >> Rossi claims a year of operation already. OK maybe that is an >> exaggeration, but it is clear to me that he has made a major breakthrough >> advance over Mills, even though he may have borrowed the basic starting >> ingredients - and so far that alone implies a fundamental difference in the >> MO. >> >> >> >> It may not be RF as the input, but it is probably going to be new physics; >> and the hypothesis of dense hydrogen (pycno) leading to a quasi-BEC has not >> been shot down yet. Of course, that could happen later today J >> >> >> >> Jones >> >> >> >> >> > > >
