On Jan 22, 2011, at 2:44 AM, Peter Gluck wrote:
OK, let's see what this Ni-H process really is, how many Cu is
actually found and so on. i simply do not believe everything what
Rossi
says. The "ash" has to be analyzed. Do you know reports about such
work?
Peter
I suspect I misunderstood the direction of your remarks. My
apologies. I focused on the definition of cold fusion simply because
there is a recent tendency to try to limit the term to mean D+D fusion.
Yes, I agree, we don't really know what this hypothesized Ni-H
process really is, or even if it is strictly a Ni-H process since it
was said there are other materials involved. Even Rossi has said he
doesn't know for sure, so that leaves everyone to speculation. I
think if we didn't speculate and hypothesize we'd have not much
nuclear physics to discuss regarding Rossi!
Sorry, I don't know of any reports regarding the analysis of the ash.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
