Summary:
1. Defkalion Energy Group goes public.
2. Work at U. Bologna will continue.
3. Rossi has a backup plan to preserve knowledge of the invention in the
event something happens to him (in the event he is killed).
- Jed
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
DEFKALION Energy Group
January 27th, 2011 at 7:11 AM
<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=395&cpage=1#comment-21160>
Marion Macy provided a [report] on the Rossi experiment of January 14th,
which we would like to clarify as representatives of the Defkalion
Group, based in Greece:
" A public announcement providing a more comprehensive overview will be
made in the coming weeks by Defkalion- an industrial company. For the
time being, it is confirmed that Defkalion will manufacture units up to
20KW for different*non-military*applications within 2011, exclusively.
Among such applications, Defkalion's units will also ensure CHP or
micro-CHP interoperability. Rights and licenses for international
markets will be assessed according to ensuing corporate interest.
This is a momentous and exciting historical technological breakthrough,
whereby energy will no longer be a scare commodity. The Rossi Energy
Catalyzer will provide totally green, cheap, and renewable energy.
Defkalion intends to use this technology in a*socially*responsible
manner, adhering to the global energy transition.
Further requests can be temporarily forwarded tostsalikog...@gmail.com
<mailto:stsalikog...@gmail.com>"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Pierre Carbonnelle
January 27th, 2011 at 3:16 PM
<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=395&cpage=1#comment-21234>
Mr. Rossi,
Here is a quote from Dr. Celani's report
(http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/01/18/rossi-and-focardi-lenr-device-celani-report/)
"They also had a twin gamma ray detector assembled in order to detect
e+e- annihilation. In this run, almost no such results were detected.
Focardi was confident that they were going to get large amounts of such
signal, as in previous experiments. This time, the counts were close to
background for coincidences, and only some uncorrelated signal was over
background."
Could you confirm this ? Any other comments / explanations ?
Thanks in advance.
Andrea Rossi
January 27th, 2011 at 5:31 PM
<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=395&cpage=1#comment-21251>
Dear Mr Pierre Carbonelle,
This is a very important question.
We will continue the research regarding the gamma rays, with the
University of Bologna's professors Levi, Villa, Bianchini. I have a
precise theory about this fact, but more tests are necessary. I am not
ready to answer to this question, also because I should have to talk
about how the reactor is made inside.
Warm regards,
A.R.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
mtiffi
January 27th, 2011 at 3:30 PM
<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=395&cpage=1#comment-21238>
Hello,
congratulation for your work. I believe in it and hope the next steps
working fine and fast.
One Question:
Did you etablished backup mechanismen (safe provisions) if something (i
don't hope so) happen to you or your team?
Is the knowledge for the mechanism lost?
Thanks a lot.
Good luck and many success for the next steps.
I believe...
mtiffi
Andrea Rossi
January 27th, 2011 at 5:17 PM
<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=395&cpage=1#comment-21246>
Dear M.Tiffi:
The answer is yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
