>From Jones: > http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llcnickelseed-lenr-networksapril-20-2011 > > Impressive presentation! But is it built on a foundation of sand? > > Boy, these guys must have a high quality PR firm, staffed with > multi-media whizzes at work 24/7… but are they trying to salvage > a brain-dead theory, and apply it to NiH by capitalizing on the > Rossi frenzy? > > Big bucks going into fancy pantsy PR presentations combined > with zero good lab work does not look good for the future of > the field.
I'm not sure everyone would agree with "...zero good lab work", but I'm definitely not the expert here. When I look at Larsen's slide show the graphics that always intrigue me are the ones shown on plate 14 pertaining to "Five-peak mass-spectrum: ULM neutron 'fingerprint' - l" ...What Larsen proponents call the 'smoking gun'. The findings would seem to suggest that there might be some physical evidence to back up their claim. (However, I'm not qualified to pass judgment, yea or nay.) What are the prevailing thoughts on what is actually being represented here? IS this possibly a 'smoking gun'? And if not, why not? Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
