In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 6 May 2011 06:47:51 -0700: Hi, [snip] >-----Original Message----- >From: mix...@bigpond.com > >>Ed Storms suggests: > >>H-e-H --> D > >The problem with this one is that the energy is all taken by the neutrino > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton%E2%80%93proton_chain_reaction#The_pep_re >action > > >Robin, > >Yes. As far back as 1996 Mitchell Swartz concluded that this is possible, >but essentially hopeless for substantial energy production in "Possible >Deuterium Production from Light Water Excess Enthalpy Experiments Using >Nickel Cathodes", Journal New Energy volume 1, 3, 68-79 (1996). > >If the energy seen by Rossi were due to P-e-P, he could make a lot more >money selling the deuterium than providing heat ;)
...unless of course it is followed by a CF reaction of the D. > >... hey ... come to think of it ... you don't think that the deuterium tank >seen at one time in Rossi's setup was indicating that he could be harvesting >the ash <g> ? nah... > >The excuse given at the time was to quench the reaction, but think about it, >do you quench fire with gold? Check the relative price .... the new gold >rush? > >Come to think of it, if the casual observer was wondering why BLP has not >countered Rossi with its own demo, yet seems to be flush with new money, >then one need only imagine the price he can get from DoD/NASA for harvested >Hy for use as either weapons or propellant. ...If NASA believed enough in Hydrinos to buy them from Mills, they would probably be making their own. ;) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
