I hope you are right, but whats' common in the Piantelli- Focardi nad the Rossi processes? And what is different?
Peter On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > The "Laws of Nature" contain all the physical laws in the universe. They > are inseparable and invariant - all intertwined and working in perfect > harmony. Each law has its specific duties. They create and guide the matter > and energy of the universe. Every cubic inch of the universe contains all of > nature’s physical laws. > > > > In the work of those who seek to take advantage of the Ni-H reaction: > Piantelli, Rossi, Mills and others, the task of analysis is to separate out > the factors that are related to engineering and those that are related to > the fundamental laws in the universe. > > > > For example, the production of light is based on physical laws inseparable > and invariant in the universe. And yet light can come from any number of > separately engineered and distinct platforms: an incandescent bulb or a > mercury vapor lamp, or a laser, or a star. > > > > But if we look deep enough the source of light is all the same. > > > > The same is true with gamma production in the Ni-H process. Gamma rays must > come from the same universal origin no matter what the engineering > peculiarities of that origin may be. > > > > In particular, it is reasonable to project the behavior of gamma production > in the Piantelli and the Rossi systems behave the same. > > > > From this paper by Ficardi et al… > > > > *Evidence of electromagnetic radiation from Ni-H Systems* > > * * > > http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/FocardiSevidenceof.pdf** > > > > [snip] During the degassing period, the very first acquisition revealed a > spectrum (Fig. 5) dramatically different from the background one. During > some acquisition sequences sample temperature was changed in the range from > 350 to 750K without any detectable variation in the spectrum. > > > > Samples were kept 52 days under vacuum before hydrogen admission in order > to study extensively the photon emission. After this too prolonged > treatment, the system did not produce energy. *It may be that the two > phenomena, extended photon emission and energy production, are alternative, > and mutually exclusive*.[/snip] > > > > > > The highlighted section may be a universal characteristic of gamma > production common to all Ni-H implementations. > > > > In the same way as Ficardi did, we must devise an array of tests to > isolate and simplify physical mechanisms related to gamma emissions using > simplified experiments to determine the physical basis of what is going on > fundamentally in the Ni-H reaction as well as cold fusion in general. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Let's suppose that 100% of what Rossi tells is 105% true. >> 100% of the time. >> Then what about this: >> >> " My process has nothing to do with the process of Piantelli,” Rossi >> wrote. “The proof is that I am making operating reactors; he is not.” (New >> Energy Times) >> >> In this case it is an error to use the data of the >> old Piantelli-Focardi cells for the E-cats. Deep mystery- a a patent can >> be captured in it. >> >> Peter >> >> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Here is “Evidence of electromagnetic radiation from Ni-H Systems” >>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/FocardiSevidenceof.pdf >>> >>> >>> >>> Emissions derived from undefined nuclear reactions were detected in three >>> successive experiments in a temperature range between 350 and 750 K. >>> >>> >>> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax < >>> a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: >>> >>>> At 12:12 AM 5/29/2011, Terry Blanton wrote: >>>> >>>>> That's one heck of a frequency conversion! >>>>> >>>> >>>> No, it simply requires that the gammas be absorbed by the apparatus. >>>> That, I believe, places an upper limit on the gamma energies, but I'm not >>>> about to calculate it, and this would also depend on the shielding >>>> thickness >>>> and the shielding material. >>>> >>>> He implies that there is gamma radiation generated during the reaction, >>>> which would point, by the way, to a scientific demonstration, showing a >>>> nuclear reaction, but it's one he does not want to do, because all that has >>>> to happen is for someone to measure the energy of those gammas, and the >>>> E-Cat could be out of the bag. >>>> >>>> Note that this demonstration would not rule out fraud. Fraud is very >>>> difficult to rule out by any sort of supervised demonstration, which is why >>>> I don't expect it to be ruled out until Rossi gets his patent protection. >>>> >>>> It's really weird. If Rossi is a scammer, he is being *protected* by US >>>> patent office refusal to grant patents, because it gives him a complete >>>> excuse to not disclose what he's doing, completely. >>>> >>>> Patents for something considered impossible should be issued. The patent >>>> applicant pays all the cost of the examination, and the patent (all >>>> patents) >>>> should clearly state that the practical operation of the device is not >>>> guaranteed by the patent office. The argument that issuance of a patent is >>>> some sort of seal of approval is preposterous, as to substance. All kinds >>>> of >>>> patented stuff has been completely useless. >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> >> > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
