Ooops, overlooked something in your message. On 11-06-19 11:39 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
3. The second test with liquid phase flow calorimetry confirmed that the first test was right
No it didn't because it wasn't public and details weren't documented. It was viewed, in private, by exactly the people whose earlier results I'm suspicious of, and they told us everything is fine, don't worry.
That's like a poker game where nobody has to show their cards, they just state what they have and everyone believes them. The "honor system" isn't used in poker, and it doesn't get you very far in science, either.
