On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Jeff Driscoll <hcarb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Why would you divide the energy  to vaporize 1 g of water (starting at
> 10 C) by the energy to heat it from 10 C to 100 C (liquid)?  Seems
> random to me.
>

Because those are the two extremes of a situation that results in the *same*
measured data that Rossi reports. I thought that was clear.

>
> I wrote out a whole scenario with (I thought) clear steps.  Give me
> your reasoning and steps.
>
>
> > These two scenarios result in the same quantitative data reported in one
> of
> > Rossi's steam producing demos, because he only reports temperature, and
> > input flow rate. So the same data is consistent (in Krivit's run) with
> 600W
> > and with 5 kW.
> > Rossi does not provide quantitative evidence that it should be closer to,
> or
> > at, the high end of that range. He only makes pronouncements based on
> things
> > like visual inspections, or unreported RH measurements, which indicate
> > nothing.
> > Now, of course, the fact that there is some steam, means it is not at the
> > bottom of the range either, but in the videos where he shows the steam,
> it
> > is not impressive.
>
>

Reply via email to