Joshua suggested off list the hose might be as long as 4.5m. (Think about all the bends etc.) If Rossi said it was 3m that was probably "Rossi speak" for "a length of hose which I haven't bothered to measure accurately but which is long enough to run down from the e-cat, along the floor into the adjoining room and up into a drain" Harry
----- Original Message ----- > From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com> > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2011 10:47:14 PM > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Krivit accuses Rossi of not being a scientist, which Rossi > isn't > > At 06:12 PM 7/3/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote: >> Damon Craig <<mailto:decra...@gmail.com>decra...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Calculating the output velocity is a good sanity check. Could you see what > you get? >> >> >> No, it isn't a good sanity check at the end of a 3 m hose. It would be > good with a short hose. > > It is a kind of sanity check, because if the steam velocity is high, the > steam > would have little opportunity to cool in the hose. I.e., with high steam > volume, > 3 meters is relatively short. > > This is not a comment on anyone's steam velocity calculation. >
