>>> 5. The pressure in the ecat cannot be room pressure, or the fluid would not flow out of the ecat into the room.
As I understand the operation, fluid does not flow out. Steam is venting from a hole in the device. Therefore, the pressure should be 'near' room pressure. So perhaps the disagreement on pressure is simply a communication issue. Craig Haynie Manchester, NH On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 10:31 -0400, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: > > > On 11-07-04 04:47 PM, Joshua Cude wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Harry Veeder <hlvee...@yahoo.com> > > wrote: > > Peter Ekstrom's analysis: > > “the E-Cat does not produce excess Energy”. > > > > http://www.fysik.org/WebSite/fragelada/resurser/cold_fusion_krivit.pdf > > > > > > > > Rossi responds to Peter Ekstrom's analysis: > > http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=497#comments > > > > > > > > Rossi has completely lost it. > > > > [...] > > > > 5. The pressure in the ecat cannot be room pressure, or the fluid > > would not flow out of the ecat into the room. > > Galantini has said that he measured the pressure in the device and it > was the same as ambient. Make of that what you will -- presumably it > means it was the same as pressure in the room to within the precision > of the measuring instrument used, but Galantini provided no numbers so > it's anybody's guess. >
