Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:

But Focardi assited Rossi, just like he assited Piantelli. If people think
> Focardi could be fooled by a demonstration of huge power excess he could
> well be get wrong the measurment of a demonstration of low power excess.


I agree this does not make sense. I was only pointing out that Rossi has
credibility problems because of his personality. People develop strange
ideas about him, such as the notion expressed here that he has a real eCat
that produces actual anomalous heat, but he also has a fake eCat which he
showed to Krivit. This makes no sense. Why would he bother to make a fake
machine if he has a real one?!?

People distrust Rossi so much, they feel compelled to make up improbable
scenarios in which he is doing something dishonest. Actually, there is no
evidence that his experiments are dishonest. Some of accusations seem
dishonest, such as his statement that Defkalion never tested his device.

What it boils down to is that Rossi rubs people the wrong way, so they go
looking for reasons to dismiss his claims.

Anyone who believes Piantelli's results has good reason to believe Rossi's.

- Jed

Reply via email to