Look in the Temp data Ecat_6_10_11.xls file on nyteknic site at 11:22:01, It does disagree with Mat's report, and it is possible there was a transcription error or somesuch. Note that the secondary water flow started at 11:00
On 14 October 2011 20:12, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Robert Lynn wrote: > > It is really perturbing that the initial temperature measurements up to >> about 11:50 have a 4.3°C temperature difference between the inlet and outlet >> of the secondary, and even at max power it only rises to about 7.2°C - >> obviously a huge temperature error, which in itself and alone makes all the >> secondary loop data totally unreliable. >> > > Where do you see that? At 11:52 the log shows a Delta T of negative 0.5°C. > That is a bias that they did not bother to adjust. It ranges from 0.5 to > 0.7°C. > > I do not see any signs of "huge temperature errors." What are you talking > about? Please refer to the specific statements in the log here: > > http://www.nyteknik.se/**incoming/article3284962.ece/** > BINARY/Test+of+E-cat+October+**6+%28pdf%29<http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3284962.ece/BINARY/Test+of+E-cat+October+6+%28pdf%29> > > - Jed > >
