Re: [Vo]:Possible mechanism-Excess Power Reading of ECAT

[Alan Fletcher]

> The Excel simulation that I developed strongly supports the contention that 
> there is no overflow of water through the output port of the ECAT. There must 
> be a logical reason for the false secondary thermocouple reading peak at ECAT 
> turn off that does not include water pulses or overflow from that port. We 
> have no information for or against water overflow for the October experiment. 
> But in September, using an apparently identical fatcat (but without the "high 
> frequencies"), Lewan unambiguously measured 50% fluid water at the "120C 1 
> Bar" operating point.