4 m^3/s is not too much. That is a column of 1.6m^2 ascending at 1.6m/s. The area that concealed the radiators was much bigger.
2011/10/31 Peter Heckert <peter.heck...@arcor.de> > They test the temperature at the output pipe, but this does not say much > about the energy when the mass flow is not known. > > When Lewan looked over the fence to the heat dissipators then he should > have feeled A LOT of hot air. He did not mention anything. > > It would be interesting to know. I have calculated there must be more than > 4 m^3 of hot air (ambient + 80 degrees) per second. > This is assuming that the air was heated by 80 degrees. > If it was heated by 40 degrees then there must be 8m^3/s of hot air and so > on. > > > Am 31.10.2011 15:10, schrieb Jed Rothwell: > > See: >> >> http://www.nyteknik.se/**nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/**article3303682.ece<http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3303682.ece> >> >> The quality of that video is better than the other ones. Lewan held the >> camera steady and explained what the viewer is seeing. There is less >> background noise. >> >> By the way, Lewan says he believes input power was measured using the >> genset internal meter. This is a highly reliable method. >> >> The thermocouples used in this test can be seen in Lewan's video. They >> are professional quality, and they are properly placed. >> >> >
