The blanket statement that those who did look into the 1 MW system and accept Krivit's version is far to encompassing. How can I determine that all of the scientists made that conclusion?
Krivit seems to have a blinded version of events where he can see nothing good in Mr. Rossi. There is plenty of question as to what his agenda is and who pays his bills. Krivit does not support his position at all with his closed minded assertions. Some of Mr. Rossi's supporters, including myself, have reviewed his test data and see LENR effects. No one argues that the data that has been gathered during these tests is difficult to interpret. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Alan J Fletcher <a...@well.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, Nov 1, 2011 12:28 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]: Large ECAT System Test Convincing But Not Pretty At 06:38 PM 10/31/2011, Danny Ross Lunsford wrote: Hi all, I'm new. What I find astounding is the knee-jerk reactions of the intelligent lay person, who may even be an engineer or a scientist in a "softer" discipline (no disrespect intended). I participate in an amateur astronomy forum where, as things go, I'm probably the senior physics person in the "Science" discussions. When I lately attempted to bring up the exciting news about LENR, there appeared from nowhere a couple of computer types who just practically shouted me down with stupid, derisive comments. When I finally lost my patience with this treatment, I was berated by the MODERATOR and the thread was locked. Now this sort of behavior is just irrational. It's just as irrational as refusing to look through Galileo's telescope because it's blasphemous to do so. So why it is so widespread? Hi, Danny .... .. you'll get used to it. I've been on the well for quite a while ... but there's practically o interest in CF/LENR : and the scientists there demand absolute roof. (And those who did look into the 1MW at all accept Krivit's version.) Alan