The blanket statement that those who did look into the 1 MW system and accept 
Krivit's version is far to encompassing.  How can I determine that all of the 
scientists made that conclusion?

Krivit seems to have a blinded version of events where he can see nothing good 
in Mr. Rossi.  There is plenty of question as to what his agenda is and who 
pays his bills.

Krivit does not support his position at all with his closed minded assertions. 

Some of Mr. Rossi's supporters, including myself, have reviewed his test data 
and see LENR effects.  No one argues that the data that has been gathered 
during these tests is difficult to interpret.

Dave


-----Original Message-----
From: Alan J Fletcher <a...@well.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue, Nov 1, 2011 12:28 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Large ECAT System Test Convincing But Not Pretty


At 06:38 PM 10/31/2011, Danny Ross Lunsford wrote:
Hi all, I'm new.

What I find astounding is the knee-jerk reactions of the intelligent 
lay person, who may even be an engineer or a scientist in a "softer" 
discipline (no disrespect intended). I participate in an amateur 
astronomy forum where, as things go, I'm probably the senior physics 
person in the "Science" discussions. When I lately attempted to 
bring up the exciting news about LENR, there appeared from nowhere a 
couple of computer types who just practically shouted me down with 
stupid, derisive comments. When I finally lost my patience with this 
treatment, I was berated by the MODERATOR and the thread was locked.

Now this sort of behavior is just irrational. It's just as 
irrational as refusing to look through Galileo's telescope because 
it's blasphemous to do so. So why it is so widespread?
Hi, Danny ....

.. you'll get used to it.
I've been on the well for quite a while ... but there's practically 
o interest in CF/LENR : and the scientists there demand absolute 
roof. (And those who did look into the 1MW  at all accept Krivit's version.)
Alan

Reply via email to