>From Robert Lynn > The problem is that it is easy to come up with fraudulent methods > that could have delivered the observed demo results. Add to > which Rossi has had no end of opportunities to remove all doubt, > at no extra cost in effort or materials, and without danger of > loss of IP, but has chosen not to for reasons that I (and others) > are unable to guess. This leads to the two hotly contested options:
That's not necessarily true at all. There may be a very practical reason as to why Rossi has behaved in such an unscientifically verifiable way that naturally leads many to seriously doubt his results: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg54430.html Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
