I was wondering how the  big oil, big government conspiracy was going to
discredit Rossi if he didn't manage to discredit himself enough (you know
with silly web sites and more silly business plans.)
But Jones you have found the build up of the back story for  them to swoop
in and claim Rossi is contaminating the world and must be shut down to save
the world.  :) :)



On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:

> Back in March, low levels of iodine-131 were found in rainwater in
> Massachusetts, not far from Rossi's New Hampshire Lab. The source was
> attribute to Fukushima, more or less by default (considering the
> coincidental timing).
>
>  http://www.thebostonchannel.com/r-video/27338488/detail.html
>
> There is a small but finite possibility that the Fukushima explanation is
> incorrect, given what we know now. The main reason to suggest that this
> iodine isotope was not from the Japanese disaster is that radioiodine makes
> up only 3% of the net mass of isotopes released in a meltdown, and yet it
> was the only species detected in Mass. A smorgasbord of isotopes travel
> together in such a catastrophic release, seldom only one.
>
> What happened to the other 97% of isotopes? Yes, iodine is one of the
> easier
> ones to detect, but xenon and others, for instance, are very likely to be
> seen by the same detectors at the exactly the same time - whenever there
> has
> been a release that can be traced to an exact event.
>
> Plus with an 8 day half-life, there are roughly 3000 miles and hundreds of
> detectors situated west of Mass. and towards Japan - any one of which
> should
> have should have picked up this isotope if it was coming from Japan on
> prevailing winds. The wind patterns make it unlikely to have come east,
> from
> the Atlantic.
>
> The recent detection of iodine-131 in Europe is equally puzzling. There is
> no update on the http://www.iaea.org/ website yet. The detectors which are
> used for this are so sensitive, however, that another explanation is
> possible. Since this isotope is used in medicine, a single patient
> undergoing radiation therapy - who is physically near the detector can set
> it off, if so inclined (as in "nature calls"). This adds new meaning to the
> shorthand notation of "P-out," does it not?
>
> BTW almost all Iodine-131 production for medicine is from
> neutron-irradiation of a tellurium target.  Irradiation of natural
> tellurium
> produces I-131 as the only radionuclide and it is very efficient since the
> tellurium is neutron heavy with a high cross section. It is a 'natural' to
> be used in LENR - if the W-L theory is correct, for instance.
>
> But mainly, all of this goes back to speculation that Bismuth telluride (or
> tellurium alone) is Rossi's secret catalyst. This possibility is related to
> the many years of R&D performed for DoE by Rossi (via Leonardo) when he was
> one of the main researchers for TEGs. There are also a number of other
> reasons why this molecule could become active for spillover hydrogen; but
> basically, it can be almost guaranteed that Rossi would have tried it with
> nano-nickel, early on, simply because he had lots of it in the Lab.
> Reputedly, AR - as an inventor, subscribes to the Edisonian approach of
> "try
> everything".
>
> Caveat: Admittedly and let's be crystal-clear that all of the above bits of
> evidence are weak, completely circumstantial - and unlikely to mean
> anything
> relevant to the Rossi E-Cat now, based on normal probabilities - and/or
> better explanations.
>
> Nevertheless, this is published here in order to provide a written record
> (in the Vortex archives), in case at a later date - accurate information
> emerges from IAEA or from Italian authorities about a radiation leak in the
> Bologna area for iodine-131 (and nothing else) ... or else Rossi or one of
> his customers admits that bismuth telluride is the secret catalyst... or
> worse ... a meltdown at a customer's facility.
>
> This is a dangerous isotope, and AR is acting a little nuttier than normal
> these days, no?
>
> Warm regards (in a radioisotopical kinda way)
>
> Jones
>
>

Reply via email to