On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If SCAMMING was Rossi’s intent, why would Rossi complicate each and every > demo with a new reactor design? > To maintain uncertainty. If he stuck with the same design, gradually, the ins and outs would become clearer, and if he is trying to deceive, clarity is not what he wants. > This goes against my concept of how a good scam should be done. > > This scam, if it is one, is taking way too long and is very confusing > and convoluted which is against everything that a good scam should be. > A good scam is not supposed to be obvious to everyone; it wouldn't work if it were. Rossi has clearly succeeded in convincing you that it is not a scam, precisely by making it long and convoluted. And to read the various forums, it is also clear that a lot of people are ready now to give him money. We have no way of knowing that he hasn't already accepted confidential investment. If people are prepared to give him money, and it doesn't look like a scam (to them), then why wouldn't he want to keep it going as long as possible? BLP has been going for 20 years, and has collected 60M dollars, all without delivering on any promises. Seems like Rossi's role model.
