Moving into acceptance? Seems to me that governments are taking the same policy 
of Cude, Yugo, and Park. 





On Nov 18, 2011, at 0:09, "Craig Brown" <cr...@overunity.co> wrote:

> I never said they DID believe Rossi. This has nothing to do with Rossi, "this 
> sector" refers to LENR in general where Rossi is only one of a growing number 
> of people with interesting and commercially useful results.
> 
> Mary, you can try and spin their statement any way you like, but it's very 
> clear. Their Chief Scientific Advisor has just admittted that "it is 
> appropriate for DECC to maintain a watch on this sector". Their words, not 
> mine. If you are having difficulty in accepting the fact that LENR is now 
> moving slowly into mainstream acceptance by gov agencies then just say so.
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Vo]: UK's DECC "Monitoring the sector" (LENR)
> From: Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, November 18, 2011 2:53 pm
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Craig Brown <cr...@overunity.co> wrote:
> I recently contacted DECC (UK equivalent of DoE) to get their view on what 
> they thought about the ecat, and to see if they had even heard of it.  I got 
> quite an interesting reply. Trigger for "further action" is an interesting 
> phrase.
> 
> 
> "DECC is aware of this alleged power source: the DECC CSA, David MacKay FRS, 
> has read some of the literature and has met Sven Kulander, who has reviewed 
> an experiment and whose report is on the Defkalion website. The CSA's 
> judgment is that it is appropriate for DECC to maintain a watch on this 
> sector, with the key trigger for further action being the publication of the 
> work in a reputable peer-refereed journal, including full details so that 
> academic scientists can replicate the results." <SNIP>
> 
> In other words, they don't believe Rossi either, on the evidence that he's 
> provided.

Reply via email to