Useless. If negative, the Rossi camp could safely claim that the Bologna guys still did not know how to get the process started correctly - that does seem to be something touchy even for Rossi. And if positive, the anti-Rossi camp could safely claim (just as now) that at least someone in group running the tests was in on the Rossi scam, and had fooled the others.
Single experimental points(or points coming all from the same source) are not sufficient to test a new device for much. On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Mattia Rizzi <mattia.ri...@gmail.com>wrote: > Ah, ask if results will be made available BEFORE patent protection. > > *From:* Mattia Rizzi <mattia.ri...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Sunday, November 27, 2011 4:04 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Rossi refuse to answer about the publication of calorimetry > test that will be done in Universities > > Many and many times Rossi said that R&D is confidential and that no > more information will be made available until patent protection. > Well, i and others guys have asked to Rossi about the publication of > caolorimetry test results from Universities, and if Bologna and Uppsala > will be free to publish the results, whatever the results will be. > Rossi didn’t publish the questions. > Since it’s not confidential data, PLEASE, go to Rossi’s website and ask > it. We deserve an answer. > Thank you for the attention. >
