In addition, the RF would have a near instantaneous effect, whereas Mary's suggestion would have a very significant time-lag. thus, as Axil pointed out, a much greater likelihood of runaway.
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 9:36 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: Of Rydberg and Radiofrequencies... Your suggestion may be possible when a automated fail safe control system is developed (maybe by National instruments) to provide some sort of negative feedback control on heat output. IMHO, until such controls are put in place, a runaway meltdown using the strategy you suggest is likely at some juncture. On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com> wrote: On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: Is there a connection? There is a connection. The purpose of the RF generator is to maintain Rydberg Matter excitation for as long as possible during the self-sustain mode when the internal heater is shut down. Wouldn't it be simpler to route some heat from the thermal output back to the input -- maybe through some sort of heat exchanger? Instead of doing like Rossi did during his first set of experiments -- dumping it in a bucket or into a wall.
