On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Charles Hope <lookslikeiwasri...@gmail.com>wrote:
> It's not relevant, because his criticism is against innumeracy, which > applies to such delusions as astrology and homeopathy, but not cold fusion, > where the most serious advocates are scientists, who certainly know their > differential equations. > It's about pseudoscience in general, and he cites cold fusion specifically. > > Why would anyone mention cold fusion in 2011, and raise P & F as the > example, while neglecting Rossi? That's really bizarre. > > My guess is that he knows it will irk the believers even more if he ignores Rossi, than if he dumps on him. It seems to be working.
