Deflation fusion theory provides a potential solution to the riddle of why the radioactive byproducts 59CU29, 61Cu29 and 62Cu29 to the Ni + p reactions do not appear in Rossi's byproducts. This solution of the specific problem byproducts is manifest if the following rules are obeyed by the environment, except in extremely improbable instances:

1. The initial wavefunction collapse involves the Ni nucleus plus two p*

2. As with all LENR, radioactive byproducts are energetically disallowed.

Here p* represents a deflated hydrogen atom, consisting of a proton and electron in a magnetically bound orbital, and v represents a neutrino.

The above two rules result in the following energetically feasible reactions:

 58Ni28 + 2 p* --> 60Ni28 + 2 v + 18.822 MeV [-0.085]

 60Ni28 + 2 p* --> 62Ni28 + 2 v + 16.852 MeV [-1.842]
 60Ni28 + 2 p* --> 58Ni28 + 4He2 + 7.909 MeV [-10.786]
 60Ni28 + 2 p* --> 61Ni28 + 1H1 + v + 7.038 MeV [-11.657]

 61Ni28 + 2 p* --> 62Ni28 + 1H1 + v + 9.814 MeV [-8.777]

 62Ni28 + 2 p* --> 64Ni28 + 2 v + 14.931 Mev [-3.560]
 62Ni28 + 2 p* --> 64Zn30 + 13.835 MeV [-4.656]
 62Ni28 + 2 p* --> 60Ni28 + 4He2 + 9.879 MeV [-8.612]
 62Ni28 + 2 p* --> 63Cu29 + 1H1 + 6.122 MeV [-12.369]
 62Ni28 + 2 p* --> 59Co27 + 4He2 + 1H1 + 00.346 MeV [-18.145]

 64Ni28 + 2 p* --> 66Zn30 + 16.378 MeV [-1.918]
 64Ni28 + 2 p* --> 62Ni28 + 4He2 + 11.800 MeV [-6.497]
 64Ni28 + 2 p* --> 65Cu29 + 1H1 + 7.453 MeV [-10.843]

   Ni28 + 2 p* ---> 2 1H1 + 0 MeV

Note that in the case where the second p* is rejected and results in 1H1, ultimately a hydrogen atom, that the electron and proton are not ejected at the same time. The large positive nuclear charge ejects the proton immediately with approximately 6 MeV kinetic energy.

This kind of zero point energy fueled proton ejection should result in detectible brehmstrahlung. This energy is in addition to the mass change energy listed above. The approximately 6 MeV free energy so gained is made up from the zero point field via uncertainty pressure expanding any remaining trapped electron's wavefunction. Such energy may also be obtained from the direct magnetic attraction of a pair of deflated protons, without the aid of a lattice nucleus. This is of the form:

   p* + P* --> 2 1H1

However, the repulsion of a proton from a proton is far less than from a large nucleus, and the electrons in this case are not trapped when the protons separate. However, some EuV radiation can be expected from the ensemble breakup. A very very small rate of pep reactions may occur:

  p + p* --> D + e+ v + 0.42 MeV

These are followed immediately by:

  e- + e+ --> 2 gamma + 0.59 MeV

and this gamma producing reaction was not observed above background in the Rossi E-cats.

The following represent energetically feasible initial strong reactions based on deflation fusion theory:

Compare to 18.822 MeV:

 58Ni28 + p* --> 59Cu29 * + 3.419 MeV [-4.867 MeV]

 58Ni28 + 2 p* --> 56Ni28 * + 4He2 + 5.829 MeV [-10.650 MeV]
 58Ni28 + 2 p* --> 60Zn30 * + 8.538 MeV [-7.941 MeV]

Compare to: 16.852 MeV:

 60Ni28 + p* --> 61Cu29 * + 4.801 MeV [-3.394 MeV]

 60Ni28 + 2 p* --> 58Ni28 + 4He2 + 7.909 MeV [-8.391 MeV]
 60Ni28 + 2 p* --> 62Zn30 * + 11.277 MeV [-5.022 MeV]

Compare to: 9.814 MeV

 61Ni28 + p* --> 58Co27 * + 4He2 + 00.489 MeV [-7.661 MeV]
 61Ni28 + p* --> 62Cu29 * + 5.866 MeV [-2.284 MeV]

 61Ni28 + 2 p* --> 59Ni28 * + 4He2 + 9.088 MeV [-7.125 MeV]
 61Ni28 + 2 p* --> 62Cu29 * + 1H1 + 5.866 MeV [-10.347 MeV]
 61Ni28 + 2 p* --> 63Zn30 * + 12.570 MeV [-3.643 MeV]

Compare to: 14.931 Mev

 62Ni28 + p* --> 59Co27 + 4He2 + 00.346 MeV [-7.760 MeV]
 62Ni28 + p* --> 63Cu29 + 6.122 MeV [-1.984 MeV]
 62Ni28 + 2 p* --> 64Zn30 + 13.835 MeV [-2.293 MeV]

Compare to: 16.378 MeV

 64Ni28 + p* --> 65Cu29 + 7.453 MeV [-0.569 MeV]
 64Ni28 + 2 p* --> 66Zn30 + 16.378 MeV [00.415 MeV]

In all cases the net reaction energies of the proposed reactions exceed those the net energies from reactions that produce radioactive isotopes. This makes rule 2 reasonable and understandable on an energy only basis. The mechanism that enforces the rule is more difficult to understand. Understanding the mechanism requires understanding the initial energy deficit due to the trapped electron. This deficit is shown in brackets above. This deficit provides a limit to how far an energetically ejected electron can travel out of the coulomb well before being pulled back. If an electron is in the nucleus at the site of the initial reaction, then a large part of the energy that normally goes into ejecting a gamma goes into ejecting the trapped electron. However, given that this energy is insufficient, the electron has numerous delayed passes through the nucleus in which to effect a weak reaction. The electron, when outside the nucleus and accelerating, is free to radiate large numbers of gammas in much smaller than normal energies. It is also notable that the electron energy deficits noted are only initial lower limits. The actual energy deficit can be much higher, depending on the radius of the deflated proton or deflated quark involved.

For background on deflation fusion theory see:

  http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg59132.html

Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/




Reply via email to