Tell you want Joshua Cude, Rich Murray and Mary Yugo, choke on this as you work you way through the data. There are other proofs besides CR-39 in the video. Film fogs, gamma detectors, the hot spot video, the piezoelectric spikes, etc. I think I counted thirteen different proofs that are redundant in making the case for anomalous heat. The SEM microcraters with transmuted crusts don't need CR-39 to show nuclear energetics. This lecture is the touchstone for an emerging industry. The co-dep foils are energetic enough to reduce uranium and nuclear wastes in wet cells. Here are the powerpoint and PDF files for the lecture. Enjoy:
http://bisbee.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/spawar.ppt
http://bisbee.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/SPAWAR-MAY-9-2009.pdf

Here is where Frank Gordon and crew are working now. They are ready to remediate nuclear waste with their foils and they too are working under the radar, given the maturity of their knowledge and trade craft. SPAWAR / DOD says they know how to burn nuclear waste, DOE says that's impossible therefore not real. To admit that nuclear waste can be remediated with co-dep foils is to admit that all their energy clients are wrong. http://www.globalenergycorporation.net/


On 12/18/2011 3:06 PM, Rich Murray wrote:
Hey,  Joshua Cude, Mary Yugo, and Rich Murray are not vengeful,
irrational, dogmatic opponents of CF in any of its forms -- it is
simply contrary to the record of their posts on Vortex-L and other
public forums to denigrate them in this unworthy and untrue way --
they are simply participating competently in the essential role of
skepticism, without which there can be only feeble scientific progress
in new directions in any field -- ad hominem attacks are hardly
evidence that all CF proponents are truly confident of the reality of
CF -- it's been 22 years since 1989, with still no actual specific
device operating at any lab, let alone at independent labs, producing
any anomaly with clearcut evidence, following a specific protocol --
nor is there any progress towards mathematically specific and correct
theory -- an obvious fraud, BlackLight Power by Randall Mills, is
still widely described as accepted science by the CF pros -- lashing
out at reasonable careful skeptics is hardly a strategy for attracting
thoughtful competent collaborators into our networks -- in the last
year I have brought up some studies that describe interesting possible
anomalies, such as claimed transmutations in water tree corrosion of
high density polyethylene in high voltage AC power cables...  SPAWAR
never responded to a specific critique by Murray in recent years that
pointed out, contrary to their assumptions, an external electric field
has no physical effects within the volume of a conductive electrolyte,
except for possible tiny leakage currents...

within mutual service,  Rich Murray, 254-A Donax Avenue, Imperial
Beach, CA 91932  505-819-7388

On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
<aussieguy.e...@gmail.com>  wrote:

I'm only small fish and late to the party. I do wish I was around when your
friend Eugene Mallove was alive. I may have ended up very bloody and lying
in the gutter but I would have put up a fight for what was right. I admire
your tenacity. I will do whatever I can to get a LENR unit working closed
loop and delivering excess electricity to a load. After that P&F, Mallove
and you deserve a Nobel. Them for Physics and you and Mallove for Peace in
never giving up on your friends nor in what you believe is right. Many
people and their lives will benefit in ways no one can foresee today because
of what P&F, Mallove and yourself have done.



On 12/18/2011 9:15 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I am sorry to report that the authorities have finally closed down cold
fusion research at SAPWAR. After Frank Gordon left, the project was on life
support. Recent reports on Fox News and elsewhere mentioned it, bringing
about the inevitable coup de grace.

Like most cold fusion projects, this was a shoestring or "bootlegged"
operation. It was done by retired researchers such as Szpak, and others
working nights and weekends. The equipment was scavenged or bought by
private individuals. But, as we all know, people opposed to cold fusion will
not tolerate any project, even if it costs essentially nothing. Academic
freedom means nothing to them. It never occurs to them they might be wrong,
because -- Like Park and Yugo -- they have read nothing and they know
nothing. They make no distinction between cold fusion and a perpetual motion
machines or water memory. Any research they disagree with _must not be
allowed_, period.


Whenever cold fusion appears in the mass media I shudder, because I know
it will trigger a backlash. Cold fusion researchers keep a low profile for a
good reason. They know perfectly well that when some nitwit such as Krivit
reveals there may be a source of funding, or a project being organized, that
will trigger opposition. Robert Park will pull strings. Others will organize
letter-writing campaigns. Mary Yugo will publish unfounded accusations of
fraud and guilt by association. You can see the dynamic at work in this
article, where someone is trying to shut down NASA interest in cold fusion:

"Why is NASA Langley Wasting Time on Cold Fusion Research?"

http://nasawatch.com/archives/2011/12/why-is-nasa-lan.html

The people in charge of the Navy and the DoE know nothing about cold
fusion, and they do not care about it. When they get letters from scientists
or members of the public saying "someone in your organization is committing
fraud" they do not ask questions. They close it down, whatever it is. Their
main concern is their public image with the taxpayers. The last thing they
need is to be accused of countenancing academic fraud or crazy research.

This has been happening for 22 years. Given this environment, it is
surprising that cold fusion survived at all. Dozens of projects such as this
one and the one at MIT were crushed, mostly without ever being allowed to
publish anything, and without any knowledge by the public. I knew about the
MIT project described by Stolper because Gene Mallove was involved, and he
was reporting to me. I was helping to fund things like this. No one else
ever learned about it because it worked. Any time positive results are
achieved, the opposition will pull out the stops to have the researchers
fired or pushed into final retirement. That's how it works. That is why I
and others gave up even trying to establish projects at major institutions
years ago. We know how it will end. That is why I think there no hope of
funding Miley et al., and no point. Sure it would be important work. But it
is not worth getting some poor grad student in trouble, or ruining her
career prospects. The results will be bottled up, the grad student's
reputation torn to shreds by nitwits, and the mass media will report only
lies and distortions. Yeah, I may get another informal positive result I can
upload to LENR-CANR.org, but that is not worth destroying someone's career.
It won't change anything.

Fortunately, Rossi and Defkalion are privately funded and immune to
interference. Rossi is well aware of how academic politics work in the U.S.
That is one of the reasons he has not made much of an effort to work with
universities and national labs. Even if they get positive results, it will
be reported as a failure and fraud. That is what happened to the National
Cold Fusion Institute, and the Japanese NEDO project. When Miles
demonstrated heat at the NEDO over a few weeks, the scientifically trained
bureaucrats in charge, who were in the same building, _refused to get up,
walk down the hall, and look_. Talk about willful ignorance! Mary Yugo has
nothing on them. They were busy writing a report saying that no positive
results were achieved. They published that in Japanese soon after Miles left
and the project was shut down. Perhaps they hoped Miles would not read it.
Miles, being no fool, sent it to me, and I translated it. He was pretty
upset but not surprised. As someone remarked "the fix was in from the
start." It could not be more blatant. Their job was to lie, stick the knife
into the project, and prevent any other research. In his book, Huizenga
bragged that was his assignment, and he was proud of how well he did it. The
2004 DoE review was also a charade. It was clear beforehand it would be a
joke, or parlor trick, not a serious review. That is why Storms refused to
participate, and why I told the participants beforehand, "beware of what you
wish for."

- Jed



Reply via email to