ok, as far as I understand, it seems to propose that industrializing a product is hard (in absolute, and for Rossi). they tell us to be ready for bad news and unexpected problems. they take the example of thermo electric device that rossi fail to industrialize correctly and demonstrate... the story they tell about TE elements is quite interesting, giving details about the failure causes (various). their position oppose the idea that rossi did a scam with TE...
like petroldragon official story you can believe it or not. for me, seeing the behavior an method of Rossi make that interpretation credible, and even coherent with petrol dragon, NI relation story... it is also totally credible compared to usual problems in any big project. however I'm not so sure of the worst, because LENR reactors are very simple. being negative with Rossi, I'll say that this is why he succeeding making a prototype, and it tooks a few month to defkalion to make a copycat without copying and industrialize it. stabilizing what I understand of an E-cat is an intern job for a young engineer. (I've got colleagues at school that did harder) stabilizing an ottoman is smarter, but once the e-cat/hyperion is stable, it is well known method, needing maybe optimal command theory (maybe things have changed since, but 20 year ago it would be what an intern would have done for a company) . some here talk about safety and redundancy. it is needed, but not so complex, because the most critical safety is basic. good design often is to separate safety low level, redundant , simple reflex loop... that simply stop unlikely catastrophe. beside a classic robust control system, more complex and less redundant. anyway redundancy is mostly a research cost, not so much hardware. it is divided by volume. note that I agree with the uncertainties you notice, however I compare them with other hypothesis. Knowing also how business, research, and psychology works, I'm not surprised... to be honnest I'm more surprised that e-cat get demonstrated in public, but it is compatible with Rossi's psychology. Defkalion behavior is much more rational according to me. 2012/1/4 Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com> > > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> >> 2012/1/4 Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com> >> >>> What opinion is that? >> >> yours, with respect. >> > > Hi Alan, > > Sorry but I didn't understand the significance of the second comment and > link. Perhaps you can restate or expand on it? Thanks. > >
