Yes, we're home. Yawn. Why should it be a surprise, if the answer is no? Others have reported excellent results, maybe not 100% but very good - and researchers in major labs or Universities took no notice. After all, they are sooo busy, busy, busy that they cannot look-up from figuring out how to waste billions trying to find that bogus boson (which they have labeled as divine) ...
Plus, this LENR stuff is "pathological science" isn't it? Even if someone in the fizzix establishment did take notice, why would they replicate Pd-D which has so little chance of commercialization, due to the thousand-fold higher cost of the reactants, instead of Ni-D which does have a chance? Jones From: James Bowery HAS ANYONE EVEN ATTEMPTED TO REPLICATE PREPARATA? Citing Preparata, Guiliano, "Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Cold Fusion Calorimetry," (ICCF-6, vol 1, October 13-18, 1996), p. 136 "Excess Heat" by Charles Beaudette, 2000 edition, p 207: Preparata "...claims to have obtained 100% reliability in building Fleischmann and Pons types of cells." (emphasis JAB) "The same [result] was observed in the about fifty similar experiments that we have conducted." (emphasis JAB)
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
