On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > >> Rossi sometimes plays word games. Jones did not claim that it was > > "given back". His comment is more like it was "returned for repairs". > > > > That is correct. Not only that, Rossi has all the characteristics of a > > pathological liar, and liars like to use "tense" to advantage. You know: > > "the meaning of is". > > I have to speak up here. I have never read a Rossi lie,
It's not so much proven lies as it is constant inconsistencies, vagueness, tangential answers to obviously relevant and harmless questions, spouting off about snakes and clowns, and general avoidance of credible answers. In a recent post on Moletrap, Alsetalokin again raises the issues. Here are a few he mentions ( here: http://www.moletrap.co.uk/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2292&page=32#Comment_163596) "First there are gammas, then there are no gammas, then there are. First the COP is 20 or more, then it's six, then it's three or less. First there's a lot of lead, then the lead isn't necessary, then it's the main way heat is produced from the gammas. He keeps his hydrogen behind ordinary stainless steel fittings which are cycled to (claimed) high temperatures. Gahh... next we'll be told that the weird construction -- core inside, then water jacket, THEN the lead shielding -- is necessary to keep the hot lead from melting down. That is, the water cools the lead. Since the heat is produced in the lead, not the core itself.... wait a minute.... safety heater.... insulation... isotopes..... Somebody hand me a #3 trepanning drill, quick, before my head umplodes." The more Rossi writes on his misnamed blog, the less credible he becomes.
