This depends on how you classify the statement. If you expected it to
help in the Rossi case, sure, it's not useful. But this was not NASA
intentions. In the other case, where they are promoting LENR, this is
tremendously helpful / useful. Therefore, I think, Gibbs headline is
misleading and therefore not useful at all.
Wolf
Well, I have to agree with Gibbs, at least in the title. He said that
NASA didn't say anything useful and not that cold fusion is useless....
2012/1/17 Ron Kita <chiralex.k...@gmail.com
<mailto:chiralex.k...@gmail.com>>
Greetings Vortex:
More Gibbs Garbage:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2012/01/16/cold-fusion-nasa-says-nothing-useful/
Gibb is not useful.
Respectfully,
Ron Kita, Chiralex
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com <mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com>
