Keef - my advice to you - is to get your act together on your real adversary. It is GOW and not LENR. LENR is essentially correct, as science. Yes, it rests on the vagaries of QM, but it may carry QM to the altar and not the other way around. Check out the LENR/CANR site, because you lose most of your allies if you try to go too far with this.
Guys, go ahead and believe in LENR, it's not a total impossibility. But PLEASE don't give encouragement to wicked scammers like Watson, Rossi and "Phucking Hippy" Sol Millin. They are Socio-paths who simply laugh at the wrecked lives they leave in their wake. Here is Greggy trying to build up the pitch for his unfortunate "investors" Greg W January 14th, 2012 at 12:19 PM Dear Mr. Rossi, I would appreciate answers to the following questions and grant that any answer is given on a “best efforts” basis under your experience/knowledge-base of the present moment and not in any way a commitment to product performance in the future: 1) If an entity could buy as many 1 MW plants as necessary and if that same entity could connect a single 1 MW Organic Rankine Cycle electricity generator [18.5% efficiency and 100% up-time] to those 1 MW plants, knowing what you now know about the efficiency and up-time of present e-cats, how many of your 1 MW units would be necessary to create a system that, after initial start-up, could run 6 months without any external electrical input [nothing outside of the single 1 MW ORC unit], such that the system would produce 1 MW of power during each moment of the entire 6 months? 2) Taking the number of 1 MW plants that you say would be necessary for the system of question 1, what would be the minimum KWh of electricity realiably available [98% up-time] to applications outside the system [that is, outside the electrical requirements to periodically excite/energize the various 1 MW E-Cat units that compose the heat-source part of the system] during each moment of that 6 months? Best wishes, Greg W.
