There are serious questions about the setup of the temperature measurements on the various E-Cat tests. Just because Rossi's thermocouple said the water was at 100 C (or whatever it read) doesn't mean that was the actual temperature.
According to Mats Lewan, Rossi provided and set up all the temperature instruments in all of the public tests (http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_ecat_eai_emails.php). If you have any independent information that the water in the E-Cat (in particular for the September test I referenced) really was no hotter than approximately 100 C. I would love to see it. If you are relying on a thermocouple that Rossi provided and installed, I'm not inclined to accept the results from it. ________________________________ From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 3:57 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:University testing of the E-cat question asked on Rossi blog John Milstone <john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com> wrote: It would also explain the long, forceful jet of water/steam coming out of the E-Cat then the high-pressure side was opened at the end of the video. Rossi would have to hide the fact that the system is actually holding a temperature much higher than the 100 C. he claims. Rossi and others measured the temperature and mass of the water dumped out of the reactor at the end, and reported it. So he is not hiding anything. Even with this crude calorimetry it is clear that total energy from input joule heating is far less than the output heat. This is a little like saying that Rossi is hiding the fact that the reactor is still there . . . by standing in front of the reactor and giving an interview on TV. That is not how most people hide an object. The reactor is big. You can't help noticing it. Not like "the purloined letter." The water is hot because of cold fusion. In the heat after death test, the data shows it would have cooled long before 4 hours elapsed. - Jed
